Many are calling the study, revealed for the first time Tuesday at a faculty meeting, an invasion of privacy, The Boston Globe reported.
"We know there are hundreds of cameras all over Harvard, and we accept that they’re there for protection and safety and security," Peter Burgard, a Harvard German professor, told The Globe. "But the idea that photographs will be taken of a class in progress without having informed the students, much less the professor, is something very different. That is surveillance."
"You should do studies only with the consent of the people being studied," Harvard computer science professor Harry Lewis told the newspaper. Lewis wrote about the issue on his blog, "Bits and Pieces."
Though he acknowledges that the intent of the study — to give feedback on teaching that would help faculty members — was valid, he disagrees with the basic concept.
Harvard Vice Provost Peter Bol replied to Lewis' concerns in a response printed on the blog, explaining the experiment in detail. It was designed to measure classroom attendance, he wrote, and the student images were all later destroyed.
Fox News said student Brett Biebelberg called the study "strikingly hypocritical," pointing to an honor code recently adopted by Harvard.
Harvard administrators were criticized for invasion of privacy once before in 2013 after revealing that they'd searched through thousands of school email accounts, The Globe reported.
No comments:
Post a Comment